Rogerian Argument Essay
(10%)
Important Dates:Topic and working thesis due in class Friday February 10 Essay due: Friday February 17See syllabus for late paper penaltyRevisions (if you choose to do one) will be due two weeks after the paper is returned to you.
Purpose and objectives
Demonstrate knowledge of the principles and features of a Rogerian argument by writing on a topic of your choosing
Address and analyze the opposing perspective (readers view) while establishing your position with supporting evidence
Propose a compromise that incorporates the collaborative and fair-minded spirit of the Rogerian argument
The Specifics
Must be 3-4 pages double spaced
Times New Roman 12 pt font
Hook and Title
Sources: Must include at least three acceptable sources with proper in-text citation and a Works Cited page (APA or MLA)
Choosing a topic and position
As discussed in class and mentioned in the text Rogerian arguments are particularly effective for emotionally charged controversial topics. So I would encourage you to select a topic that you feel connected to in some way but please avoid general overly-argued topics that have been argued excessively (not the death penalty is bad). Controversial doesnt mean your topic has to be heavy or necessarily life or death however. What makes you mad? What gets you fired up politically or socially? Is there a local issue youve been following closely that would lend itself to this type of argument? Please feel free to chat with me about your topic if there are any concerns or questions.
A word on sources
No Wikipedia or Quora or anything in that shady/academically unsuitable vein.
Acceptable: Credible Updated Trustworthy Websites (.edu .org or .gov)
Relevant news articles from reputable news organizations (using the criteria we will discuss in class)
Academic Journal Articles (through library database)
Government Reports
Primary Sources (e.g. Official Notices source on page 199 under Works Cited) As the writer keep in mind the following goals and objectives:
General Structure below is a framework you can follow for your paper which also includes the major components I will be looking for when reviewing and grading:
Introduction
Hook.
Sets up the problem in appropriate language and establishes common ground
Statement of the Readers view of the problem
Include your acknowledgement/concessions/merit in their side (one source here)
Statement of your side: Writers side
Present and discuss your evidence (two sources here)
Address how the reader would benefit from seeing your side (statement of mutual benefits)
Conclusion
Convey possible compromise