PhD TIM- Examine And Critique A Scholarly Article Related To Mobile Computing Challenges

Gruhn, V., & Kohler, A. (2007, May). Analysing and enhancing business processes and IT-systems for mobile workforce automation – A framework approach. Euro American Conference on Telematics & Information Systems, 1-8.
https://doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.1145/1352694.1352721

Haaker, T., Faber, E., & Bouwman, H. (2004, March). Balancing strategic interests and technological requirements for mobile services. In M. Janssen, H. G. Sol, & R. W. Wagenaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 609-618).
https://doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.1145/1052220.1052298

Hess, S., & Jung, J. (2012). Does the iPad add value to business environments? In Extended Abstracts: CHI 2012 – The 30th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) (pp. 335-350).
http://dl.acm.org.proxy1.ncu.edu/citation.cfm?id=2212813

Conduct a critical review of ONE of this week’s assigned scholarly readings (SEE ABOVE) addressing the items below. Be sure to provide literature support where applicable.

• Identify the paper you will be      critiquing, and provide insight as to why it was selected over the others.
• Describe the problem addressed. Why is      it important? Is this an agreed-upon problem?
• Describe what was accomplished by the      study. What was not achieved?
• Describe the methodology the study      utilized. Was it appropriate? Justify.
• Describe the study results and the      contribution it made to the body of knowledge, if any.
• Describe possible extensions to the      research, if any. In what ways can the study be enhanced or modified to      provide additional value? Discuss any limitations or assumptions held      within the study and how they can be addressed.
• Present the study experiment, and      outline the setup and resources utilized, if applicable. If no experiment      was conducted, describe how the authors conducted their study, gathered their      data, and the process by which they arrived at their conclusions. Are they      appropriate? What other methods could have been utilized?
• Identify at least two possible areas of      research extension or future work. Justify those areas of future work with      citations from the scholarly literature beyond the article being reviewed.

Justify your writing with evidence from the scholarly literature beyond the article being reviewed.

Length: 4-5 pages not including title page and references

Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.